The Cowtown Humanist
Official publication of the Humanists of Fort Worth ● http://www.hofw.org ● E-mail: Info@hofw.org
A Chapter of the American Humanist Association and allied with the Council for Secular Humanism
Volume 5, Number 4 E-mailed
HUMANISTS CELEBRATE SUMMER SOLSTICE AT
DICK TRICE TO BE JULY SPEAKER
EVOLUTIONARY STUDIES CONTINUE JULY 9
HUMANISTS ENJOY FOOD, DRINK, CAMARADIE AND GOOD CONVERSATION
Twenty-five adult and four junior humanists celebrated the
summer solstice together at
Russell and Gayle Elleven were there early to stake out a table and to provide guide marks to our location. Thanks to them we, and especially the juniors, were treated to a cold, ripe watermelon. Also thanks are due to Don and Dolores Ruhs for tables and chairs as well as to other members who contributed to the fun.
members congregate at
The topic of Dick's talk will be "Christianity: The Power of Recycling and Repression": If the faithful realized that Christian dogma is a recycling of ancient superstitions and how punishments had been meted out to silence dissent, there might be fewer Christians and more Humanists. We'll take a look at the early congruence of Christianity with pagan religions such as Mithraism and Zoroastrianism, and with the Gnostic movement, and learn why much about Christianity's origins has been kept under the lid.
INTERVIEW WITH DICK
JHC: Could you tell us something about your religious background, Dick. Having grown up with a rather "bleached Methodism", I have always found it rather difficult to understand why many people attach so much importance to religion. I gather that your formative religious experiences were very different from mine.
DT: Too much drama in a youngster's life has lasting effects and this explains my continuing interest in religion and, I hope, some of my other eccentricities. I was a committed Baptist, in fact, baptized in J. Frank Norris's church when I was about ten, prayed daily, and attended church regularly until about 16. I vividly remember a period of great fear, of being struck by God's lightning because of my doubts. Learning more about other religions and the astonishing (to me) fact that Christians--even truer of Baptists--were a minority of the world/s population, overcame the hurdles to freethinking. Not being alone, either physically or mentally, is comforting.
JHC: Starting about 600 BCE an intellectual elite, the lovers of wisdom, devised naturalistic interpretations of worldly phenomena. Epicureanism, stoicism and skepticism were products of their efforts, if not to banish the gods, at least to relegate them to a secondary role. Yet by the 6th Century CE these philosophical movements were dead and Christianity was triumphant in the western world. Was it an inability to compete that was their undoing?
DT: My guess is that they failed for the same reason most philosophies fail: they don't relate sufficiently to the quotidian lives of people. All three, however, resonate to some extent in many people today.
JHC: When I think about proselytizing, I am always brought up short by recollection of a scene from "Inherit the Wind" in which, as I recall, a lawyer from the prosecution and a lawyer from the defense during a trial recess are discussing the morality of disabusing people of cherished beliefs. The former asks the latter something like the following: "Henry, why do you want to destroy the faith of these little people? They are poor and uneducated. Religion is the only beautiful thing they have in their lives." The British philosopher, A.J. Ayer, (an atheist, by the way) had already written something in the same vein, to wit, that Humanists, who are generally well-educated and cultivated, have a responsibility to offer something as satisfying as religious faith before they begin to proselytize the masses to their point of view, which is in all truthfulness rather stringent emotionally.
DT: There is no doubt that many people, especially the older, would suffer more from the loss of comforting illusions and hopes. A.J. Ayer seems to think that there are no alternatives for the ignorant and helpless than to ameliorate their suffering with false hope. That may be true of some but it completely overlooks the surrender of more realistic advantages for the benefit of the whole of humankind. No, I am not reticent about attempting to persuade people away from their religious (or political) illusions because I think the advantages to society as a whole tremendously outweigh the benefits of religious superstition.
This weaning way 1) relieves fear of eternal punishment; 2)
by eliminating irrational thinking, frees them for creativity, concentration on
learning, discovery, the achievement of social justice and equality; 3) opens
the way to defying subjugation and to demanding fair treatment; 4) reduces
vulnerability to demagoguery and subservience to dictatorship, 5) liberates
tremendous energy and capital for more worthy, more humane causes; 6) disperses
an army of parasitic priests for useful labors; 7) eliminates the millions of
murders and countless torture committed
in the name of religion; 8) encourages the development of personal reliance and
courage to overcome the crutch that constitutes the hallmark of most religions.
One of my favorite Bertrand Russell quotes is:
"There is something feeble and a little contemptible about a man
(or woman) who cannot face the perils of life without the help of comfortable
myths." A strong encouragement for
hope is the growing preponderance of non-belief in
My preference of humanism to religion, however, does NOT rule out what many people call spirituality. I don't like to call it by that term, but I feel that a humanist can experience emotions of awe, wonder, mystery, exhilaration, love, appreciation and other deep feelings as well as any believer. I just don't think the supernatural is at all necessary for those experiences.
MORE ON RELIGION
TO BELIEVE OR NOT TO BELIEVE
It has been heralded as one of the biggest crises in
EVANGELICALS OPPOSE ROAD MAP TO PEACE
Christians mainly belonging to
Church leaders such as the Rev. Jerry Falwell and Rev. Pat Robertson have been criticizing President Bush's vision of Palestinian statehood.
Although not of one mind when it comes to
Video presentations of Lecture 5 and 6 will be shown at
Westside Unitarian Universalist Church again on the second Wednesday of the
month. If you didn't see the earlier
videos, much has been lost but that is no reason to miss out on a high quality
presentation. The lecturer, Edward J.
Larsen, has a law degree from Harvard, and an M.A. and Ph.D. in the history of science
from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
He currently holds a joint appointment in the history department and law
school at the
Following are brief descriptions of the lectures:
Lecture Five: Debates over Mechanism
Scope: Buoyed by
Even as biologists accepted the basic theory of evolution,
they came to doubt the sufficiency of
Lecture Six: Missing Links
Scope: Although by 1900 most Western biologists and intellectuals accepted some theory of evolution, popular and religious opposition remained. Technical arguments that appealed to scientists failed to persuade the public, particularly when it came to the notion that humans evolved from apes. The same fossil record that inspired Lamarck and Darwin increasingly became a barrier to popular acceptance of their ideas. Opponents decried the lack of fossils linking either major biological types (such as reptiles and mammals} or humans to their supposed simian ancestors.
Beginning late in the nineteenth century, those intent on proving the theory of evolution hunted for missing links in the fossil record. Scientific and popular interest focused on finding evidence of prehistoric humans and hominids. Any such "missing links" became front-page news and boosted the popular acceptance of evolution.
LIBRARIES MUST USE FILTERS
In a 6-3 ruling on June 23, the Supreme Court upheld a federal law that requires public libraries to install pornography filters on all computers providing Internet access, as a condition of continuing to receive federal subsidies and grants.
Chief Justice Rehnquist said limitations on access to the Internet were, for library users, of no greater significance than limitations on access to books that librarians chose for whatever reason not to acquire. Two other members of the majority, Kennedy and Breyer, wrote separately to express constitutional concerns about the statute, the Children's Internet Protection Act, and to suggest that it could be subject to a new First Amendment challenge if it proved unduly burdensome after it went into effect. (Other news sources predict the issue will soon be back in the court for this very reason.)
The justices debated the extend to which "overblocking" infringes the First Amendment rights of adult library users. Sexually explicit material that comes under the general heading of pornography has First Amendment protection. although obscenity and child pornography do not.
"An abridgment of speech by means of a threatened
denial of benefits can be just as pernicious as an abridgment by means of a
threatened penalty," Justice Stevens said. (NYT,
6-3 margin, the Supreme Court nullified the
REJECTS CHALLENGE OF
court turned away a challenge to
COURT UPHOLDS SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR DEFENDING THE POOR
The Supreme Court, on a 5-4, vote upheld Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts, a vital source of funds for legal services for the poor nationwide that was challenged by conservative legal groups. (NYT)
POST 9/11 SECURITY REPORT
"The government's harsh measures against immigrants since Sept. 11 have failed to make us safer, have violated our fundamental civil liberties and have undermined national unity, the Migration Policy Institute has concluded in a just released 165-page report. The past two immigration commissioners, from the Clinton and Bush administrations, contributed advice to the report, along with a former top official with the CIA and National Security Council.
"Many of those policies ended up alienating and antagonizing communities whose help we need," said Vincent Cannistraro, who headed counterterrorism operations and analysis for the CIA. (Knight-Ridder)
BUSH NOMINATES CONTROVERSIAL FIGURE TO 9TH COURT OF APPEALS
President Bush has nominated the Alabama Attorney General, William Pryor, to serve on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. Pryor has been quoted as declaring Roe v. Wade had "ripped the Constitution and ripped out the life of millions of unborn children. On one occasion he dismissed the Supreme Court as "nine octogenarian lawyers." On another occasion, he ended a speech with a prayer for "no more Souters". "If a far-right legal group needs a lawyer to argue extreme positions against abortion, women's rights, gay rights and civil rights, Mr. Pryor may be a suitable candidate. But he does not belong on the federal bench," editorializes the NYT.
COUNCIL FOR SECULAR HUMANISTS WANTS TO SHARPEN YOUR WITS
For anyone interested in debating, in print or in formal
oral debates, against religious spokespeople, theologians, Christian-nation
mythologists, or others of similar mindset, come to the first ever Debater's
Toolbox, to be held in Amherst NY on 31 July through 3 August 2003.
(Also for those who want to learn more about debating these opponents, even
if you never expect to debate yourself.) Thanks to a generous
supporting grant from
FFRF 2003 CONVENTION IN
annual convention of the Freedom from Religion Foundation will be held in
A federal appeals court unanimously ruled that a Ten Commandments monument the size of a washing machine must be removed from the Alabama Supreme Court building.
"If we adopted his position, the chief justice would be free to adorn the walls of the Alabama Supreme Court's courtroom with sectarian religious murals and have decidedly religious quotations painted above the bench," the three-judge panel said. (CNN/AP)
The Cook County Board agreed to create a registry for same-sex couples, a system advocates said would help companies that extend benefits to domestic partners.
The board voted 13-3 on Tuesday to grant the domestic partnership certificates for a $30 filing fee at the county clerk's office. (Fort Worth Star-Telegram)
Katherine Hepburn 1907-2003
PASSING OF A DISTINGUISHED HUMANIST
"I'm what is known as gradually disintegrating. I don't fear the next world, or anything. I don't fear hell, and I don't look forward to heaven."
--Katherine Hepburn (1990)
Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, by Francis Fukuyama (2002)
O brave new world,
That has such people in 't.
The blurb on the cover of this book describes
You can toss human nature out with a pitchfork
But it will always come running back.
Not so fast!
We have a foretaste of what may come in the drugs Prozac (ego enhancement) and Ritalin (social control). People who have at least partial control over their behavior may increasing opt for an easy way out, that is become increasingly reliant on products of the biotech revolution to achieve personal and societal objectives. This first generation of psychotropic drugs will surely give way to ever more powerful successors that wreak havoc with human nature itself. And if this weren't enough, we have now been brought to the frontier of genetic interventions on humans.
Powerful political forces, he claims, favor continuation of this danger-fraught trend:
The first is the desire on the part of ordinary people to medicalize as much of their behavior as possible and thereby reduce their responsibility for their own action. The second is the pressure of powerful economic interests to assist in this process. These interests include social service providers such as teachers and doctors, who will always prefer biological shortcuts to complex behavioral interventions, as well as the pharmaceutical companies that produce the drugs. The third trend...is the tendency to expand the therapeutic realm to cover an ever larger number of conditions
He advises caution, which implies political controls over science and technology.
Since publication of this book, neurosurgery has developed techniques that raise the possibility of changing the human identity itself. A recent article in The Economist magazine reports the development of prosthetic devices to correct degenerative brain disorders that might in fact completely change the personality of the patient. "If you alter the brain, how much of this can you do before you make an entirely new person?" asks Arthur Caplan, Chairman of the Department of Medical ethics at the Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
Have we escaped 1984 only to lapse into Aldus Huxley's Brave New World?
For an up-to-date listing of meetings and events, see the calendar on the HoFW e-list group page.
July Evolution Studies
The next installment of the Evolution series will be Wednesday, July 9, from at Westside UU Church.
The next regular HoFW meeting will
be July 15 at
The next quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors is set
August Evolution Studies
The August installment of the Evolution series will be Wednesday, August 13, from at Westside UU Church.
August HoFW Meeting
The regular HoFW meeting will be
Tuesday, August 19 at
Chairman and Webmaster: Russell
Elleven, 6120 Comfort Dr.,
Fort Worth TX 76132; 817-370-2171; email@example.com
Vice Chair and Newsletter Editor: Jim Cheatham, 1582 CR 2730,
Secretary: Reed Bilz, 6316 Walburn Ct., Fort
Treasurer: Dolores Ruhs, 1036 Hilltop Pass, Benbrook 76126-3848;
Immediate Past Chair: Mike Haney, 924 Roaring Springs Rd.,
Fort Worth 76114; Ph. 817-737-7047; firstname.lastname@example.org
Past Chairman and Programs Director: Jeff Rodriguez,
4901 Bryce Ave., #5, Fort Worth TX 76102; 817-732-4235; email@example.com
If you have not done so already, please remember to pay your annual dues. You may pay at any regular meeting or contact treasurer Dolores Ruhs via e-mail or regular mail. Dues may be paid as follows:
E-mail Newsletter only (Per Year)
Mailed Printed Newsletter
Couple or Family
who live outside counties that border
Call to Humanists
Is there something we forgot to mention in the newsletter? Do you have a comment or suggestion? E-mail Michael Rivera (firstname.lastname@example.org) with:
Humanists of Fort Worth Internet Group
If you haven’t already done so, subscribe to the HoFW group e-list, HumanistsFW. Enter your e-mail below and click the “Join Now!” button. If you’ve already subscribed, click the “groups” link and start a conversation. You can choose to receive each individual post by e-mail, get a digest of new postings once per day, or choose no e-mail and only view postings online. Contact Michael Rivera if you have questions or need help.
Joyful Living; Rational Thought;
Phone (817) 370-2171; E-mail: email@example.com
HUMANISM AND ITS ASPIRATIONS
Humanist Manifesto III, a successor to the Humanist Manifesto of 1933
Humanism is a progressive philosophy of life that, without supernaturalism, affirms our ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity.
The lifestance of Humanism—guided by reason, inspired by compassion, and informed by experience—encourages us to live life well and fully. It evolved through the ages and continues to develop through the efforts of thoughtful people who recognize that values and ideals, however carefully wrought, are subject to change as our knowledge and understandings advance.
This document is part of an ongoing effort to manifest in clear and positive terms the conceptual boundaries of Humanism, not what we must believe but a consensus of what we do believe. It is in this sense that we affirm the following:
Knowledge of the world is derived by observation, experimentation, and rational analysis. Humanists find that science is the best method for determining this knowledge as well as for solving problems and developing beneficial technologies. We also recognize the value of new departures in thought, the arts, and inner experience—each subject to analysis by critical intelligence.
Humans are an integral part of nature, the result of unguided evolutionary change. Humanists recognize nature as self-existing. We accept our life as all and enough, distinguishing things as they are from things as we might wish or imagine them to be. We welcome the challenges of the future, and are drawn to and undaunted by the yet to be known.
Ethical values are derived from human need and interest as tested by experience. Humanists ground values in human welfare shaped by human circumstances, interests, and concerns and extended to the global ecosystem and beyond. We are committed to treating each person as having inherent worth and dignity, and to making informed choices in a context of freedom consonant with responsibility.
Life’s fulfillment emerges from individual participation in the service of humane ideals. We aim for our fullest possible development and animate our lives with a deep sense of purpose, finding wonder and awe in the joys and beauties of human existence, its challenges and tragedies, and even in the inevitability and finality of death. Humanists rely on the rich heritage of human culture and the lifestance of Humanism to provide comfort in times of want and encouragement in times of plenty.
Humans are social by nature and find meaning in relationships. Humanists long for and strive toward a world of mutual care and concern, free of cruelty and its consequences, where differences are resolved cooperatively without resorting to violence. The joining of individuality with interdependence enriches our lives, encourages us to enrich the lives of others, and inspires hope of attaining peace, justice, and opportunity for all.
Working to benefit society maximizes individual happiness. Progressive cultures have worked to free humanity from the brutalities of mere survival and to reduce suffering, improve society, and develop global community. We seek to minimize the inequities of circumstance and ability, and we support a just distribution of nature’s resources and the fruits of human effort so that as many as possible can enjoy a good life.
Humanists are concerned for the well being of all, are committed to diversity, and respect those of differing yet humane views. We work to uphold the equal enjoyment of human rights and civil liberties in an open, secular society and maintain it is a civic duty to participate in the democratic process and a planetary duty to protect nature’s integrity, diversity, and beauty in a secure, sustainable manner.
Thus engaged in the flow of life, we aspire to this vision with the informed conviction that humanity has the ability to progress toward its highest ideals. The responsibility for our lives and the kind of world in which we live is ours and ours alone.